Talk:3067: SawStart

It's weird seeing a totally empty explanation, also whats the point of sawstop, don't they just use vibrating blades? 104.23.190.110 12:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

SawStop is for rotating blades, like you would use for sawing wood. I'm sure there's a good reason why they don't use vibrating blades there, the most likely is "wood is harder than a plaster cast". I could also imagine that vibrating blades don't create nice cuts, which doesn't matter with a plaster cast that will be disposed of, but very much matters with wood used for construction. --Coconut Galaxy (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

empty explanation is freaky woah 172.69.194.204 12:42, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Every explanation is empty, at least for a short amount of time. And this is not the earliest that a comic went up (shortly after midday, UK time, when it's not unknown for them to not arrive until after the midnight at the end of the designated publication day), but it looks like you (both, including first-poster at the top) have had the good luck/fortune to be just casually checking for new changes to old articles on the site and instead get 'first look' at the newest addition to it. Of course, it'll be a few hours before most of the article gets fine-tuned into some form of 'completion'. 172.70.86.157 13:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

sudo systemctl stop saw-start.service 172.69.208.132 13:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

yay you saved the world! --hi (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

"Failed to stop saw-start.service: Access restricted by systemd security policies"

sudo holding-in-the-power-button doesn't work either.172.69.34.139 17:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm 99% sure that the system is designed to start a stopped blade up to full speed within milliseconds, not just increase the speed of a spinning blade. --Coconut Galaxy (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

WAITER, WAITER, MORE Black Hat PLEASE Caliban (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Because of gyroscopic precession, a still spinning (unstoppable?) blade, removed from its axle and housing, would be /very/ difficult and dangerous to dispose of. I'm a woodworker and I think I'll be having nightmares tonight. -DW 172.69.23.176 13:36, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

At least if it's unstoppable we can use it as a free source of energy! 172.69.195.62 14:01, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

As a woodworker, one note I would like to make is that while the sawblade can be damaged by cartridge activation, it is not required that it be replaced. It is possible to have the blade inspected and potentially repaired and continue to use it. That is addressed in SawStop's FAQ https://www.sawstop.com/sawstop_faq/can-the-blade-be-reused-if-the-safety-system-brake-is-activated/ 172.69.33.189 15:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

The [citation needed] for violating other laws probably means that law enforcement should issue a citation to the manufacturer. Barmar (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

General observation from a s/w test engineer/woodworker: Original version of the Sawstop used a shotgun shell to fire a stopper into the sawblade which absolutely did destroy the blade. (and made enough noise to pretty much ensure a 'code brown' if you triggered the stop system.) Newer version uses a high tension spring along with a deformable aluminum stopper assembly to absorb the energy and bring the blade to a stop. The advantage of the deformable aluminum assembly is that you can remove it from the blade (with care) and as noted can put the sawblade back to work. However you need a new ($200-ish) stopper assembly before you can re-start the saw. Having a family member who is a retired emergency room doctor who would regularly email me 'stories from work' of woodworker injuries who came through her ER, I can assure you that a tablesaw is pretty much the most dangerous woodworking tool in a typical woodshop. That being said, its quite amusing to me that "SawStop" became XKCD worthy. SawStop is somewhat notorious in the woodworking community because of their highly obnoxious business practices with regards patent and legal attacks on business competitors who came up with alternative approaches to the 'saw brake' or 'saw safety' system. JC from Canada 172.69.33.194 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Funny, the version I'd heard from the woodworking community was SawStop getting vast pushback from their competitors who didn't want to licence the first saw safety systems, and then spent a vast amount of money making their own inferior systems when Sawstop pushed for tablesaws to have to have some sort of safety system. But I suppose it's all a matter of which set of propaganda from the businesses you're buying into. 172.69.195.180 11:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Funnily enough this could be practical in robot combat 104.23.190.1515:01, 24 March 2025 EST

Note that since the blade is spun up using explosives and not the electric motor (even ignoring the title text), the saw being unplugged in no way makes the blade safe to touch. 172.68.23.226 20:03, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

The explosive charge would already be deadly. --[insert signature here] (talk) 00:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Why is it important to include the fact that this could be used in robot warfare? Ozymandias (talk)